SENTINEL

prices: Yahoo Finance (yfinance), cross-checked vs Finnhub · scanned 04 Sep 08:46 Asia/Jerusalem (10 hours ago)

Top picks · 2 buys of 150 scanned · 1 strong

Full scan

#	Ticker	Verdict	Score	Price	Upside	Valuation	Layer
1	NVDA	STRONG BUY	0.97	228.45	+43%	CHEAP	compute
2	NXPI	BUY	0.82	224.99	+38%	CHEAP	semiconductors
3	CRDO	WAIT	0.78	164.17	+69%	CHEAP	networking
4	AVGO	WAIT	0.77	357.16	+47%	CHEAP	compute
5	STX	WAIT	0.70	798.61	+41%	CHEAP	memory
6	MRVL	WAIT	0.69	208.83	+36%	FAIR	compute
7	RMBS	WAIT	0.67	84.34	+75%	FAIR	semiconductors
8	AMD	WAIT	0.67	456.16	+35%	FAIR	compute
9	TSM	WAIT	0.64	417.01	+32%	EXPENSIVE	foundry
10	GOOGL	WAIT	0.59	342.48	+25%	EXPENSIVE	cloud
11	VRT	WAIT	0.58	268.83	+26%	EXPENSIVE	power
12	NXT	WAIT	0.58 ⚠	83.50	+69%	CHEAP	semiconductors
13	AEIS	WAIT	0.58	274.30	+56%	CHEAP	equipment
14	ONTO	WAIT	0.57 ⚠	252.46	+54%	FAIR	equipment
15	MPWR	WAIT	0.57	1,213.65	+52%	EXPENSIVE	semiconductors
16	GEV	WAIT	0.57 ⚠	941.84	+31%	EXPENSIVE	power
17	Q	WAIT	0.56	118.47	+49%	FAIR	semiconductors
18	CDNS	WAIT	0.56	304.88	+32%	EXPENSIVE	eda
19	ORCL	WAIT	0.56	154.04	+57%	EXPENSIVE (1.5x own history; FAIR vs peers)	cloud
20	MTSI	WAIT	0.56	259.95	+52%	EXPENSIVE	semiconductors
21	ALAB	WAIT	0.55	282.82	+38%	EXPENSIVE	networking
22	STM	WAIT	0.55	51.28	+46%	FAIR	semiconductors
23	ANET	WAIT	0.54	191.44	+26%	EXPENSIVE	networking
24	ASML	WAIT	0.52	1,646.19	+31%	EXPENSIVE (2.1x own history; FAIR vs peers)	equipment
25	KEYS	WAIT	0.51	322.62	+29%	EXPENSIVE	components
26	ADI	WAIT	0.51	356.50	+32%	EXPENSIVE (1.8x own history; FAIR vs peers)	semiconductors
27	LIN	WAIT	0.51	482.19	+13%	FAIR	materials
28	AMAT	WAIT	0.50	435.91	+47%	EXPENSIVE (2.2x own history; FAIR vs peers)	equipment
29	TXN	WAIT	0.50	253.83	+28%	EXPENSIVE (2.3x own history; FAIR vs peers)	semiconductors
30	SMTC	WAIT	0.50	135.40	+55%	EXPENSIVE (1.7x own history; FAIR vs peers)	semiconductors
31	AMZN	WAIT	0.48 ⚠	258.90	+27%	EXPENSIVE	cloud
32	CRUS	WAIT	0.47	113.13	+46%	CHEAP	semiconductors
33	NVMI	WAIT	0.47	352.70	+51%	EXPENSIVE (1.6x own history; FAIR vs peers)	equipment
34	KLAC	WAIT	0.47	172.94	+35%	EXPENSIVE (2.9x own history; FAIR vs peers)	equipment
35	MSFT	WAIT	0.47	510.12	+12%	EXPENSIVE	cloud
36	NVT	WAIT	0.44	152.09	+34%	EXPENSIVE (2.0x own history; FAIR vs peers)	power
37	TER	WAIT	0.44	338.59	+32%	EXPENSIVE	equipment
38	CSCO	WAIT	0.43	108.61	+27%	EXPENSIVE (2.4x own history; FAIR vs peers)	networking
39	CIEN	WAIT	0.42	317.46	+74%	EXPENSIVE	networking
40	SIMO	WAIT	0.42	235.70	+57%	EXPENSIVE (1.9x own history; FAIR vs peers)	components
41	LRCX	WAIT	0.40	292.66	+27%	EXPENSIVE (3.0x own history; FAIR vs peers)	equipment
42	GFS	WAIT	0.38 ⚠	44.53	+71%	CHEAP	foundry
43	LSCC	WAIT	0.38	113.63	+45%	EXPENSIVE	semiconductors
44	SITM	WAIT	0.37	574.47	+50%	EXPENSIVE	semiconductors
45	ON	WAIT	0.36	73.65	+46%	EXPENSIVE (2.0x own history; FAIR vs peers)	semiconductors
46	ARM	WAIT	0.36	242.59	+18%	EXPENSIVE	compute
47	FORM	WAIT	0.34	96.76	+43%	EXPENSIVE	semiconductors
48	DIOD	WAIT	0.34	89.94	+81%	EXPENSIVE (1.7x own history; FAIR vs peers)	semiconductors
49	KLIC	WAIT	0.33	78.82	+35%	EXPENSIVE (2.5x own history; FAIR vs peers)	semiconductors
50	SNPS	WAIT	0.33	416.31	+31%	EXPENSIVE	eda
51	ETN	WAIT	0.32	397.12	+20%	EXPENSIVE (2.6x own history; FAIR vs peers)	power
52	TSEM	WAIT	0.29	206.16	+53%	EXPENSIVE	semiconductors
53	IPGP	WAIT	0.26	76.46	+65%	EXPENSIVE	semiconductors
54	ACLS	WAIT	0.26	110.37	+46%	EXPENSIVE (1.8x own history; FAIR vs peers)	equipment
55	ALGM	WAIT	0.23 ⚠	35.56	+54%	FAIR	semiconductors
56	POWI	WAIT	0.23	50.54	+53%	EXPENSIVE	semiconductors
57	PENG	WAIT	0.22	48.63	+53%	CHEAP	semiconductors
58	SNDK	AVOID	0.51	1,554.99	+37%	CHEAP	components
59	CLS	AVOID	0.44 ⚠	309.84	+54%	FAIR	hardware
60	META	AVOID	0.34	610.68	+24%	CHEAP	application
61	EME	AVOID	0.30	741.32	+39%	FAIR	power
62	APH	AVOID	0.29	82.07	+17%	EXPENSIVE	hardware
63	OLED	AVOID	0.29	82.64	+40%	FAIR	hardware
64	PLAB	AVOID	0.27	28.18	+47%	CHEAP	equipment
65	NOW	AVOID	0.26	145.59	-3%	FAIR	application
66	AGX	AVOID	0.26	411.77	+62%	EXPENSIVE (2.3x own history; FAIR vs peers)	power
67	SPXC	AVOID	0.25	193.92	+40%	EXPENSIVE (1.6x own history; FAIR vs peers)	thermal
68	MYRG	AVOID	0.25	284.10	+45%	EXPENSIVE (1.3x own history; FAIR vs peers)	power
69	FFIV	AVOID	0.24	392.15	+11%	FAIR	networking
70	FSLR	AVOID	0.24	207.42	+33%	EXPENSIVE (1.5x own history; FAIR vs peers)	semiconductors
71	HUBB	AVOID	0.24	460.15	+23%	EXPENSIVE (1.5x own history; FAIR vs peers)	hardware
72	TT	AVOID	0.23	445.19	+18%	EXPENSIVE (1.6x own history; FAIR vs peers)	thermal
73	JBL	AVOID	0.23	305.92	+44%	EXPENSIVE (2.7x own history; FAIR vs peers)	hardware
74	TEL	AVOID	0.23	209.41	+18%	EXPENSIVE (1.5x own history; FAIR vs peers)	components
75	DGII	AVOID	0.22	70.28	+22%	FAIR	networking
76	CAMT	AVOID	0.22 ⚠	138.90	+34%	FAIR	equipment
77	UMC	AVOID	0.22	19.86	-7%	EXPENSIVE	foundry
78	ARW	AVOID	0.21	210.87	+11%	CHEAP	components
79	FLEX	AVOID	0.20	107.89	+49%	EXPENSIVE (2.7x own history; FAIR vs peers)	hardware
80	IBM	AVOID	0.19	234.71	+5%	EXPENSIVE (2.1x own history; FAIR vs peers)	cloud
81	MCHP	AVOID	0.19	73.11	+49%	EXPENSIVE (4.2x own history; FAIR vs peers)	semiconductors
82	PWR	AVOID	0.19	620.06	+24%	EXPENSIVE	power
83	EXTR	AVOID	0.19	21.89	+53%	EXPENSIVE (1.5x own history; FAIR vs peers)	networking
84	OSIS	AVOID	0.19	206.62	+35%	CHEAP	semiconductors
85	FTNT	AVOID	0.19	156.36	+4%	EXPENSIVE	hardware
86	PLTR	AVOID	0.18	182.53	+5%	EXPENSIVE	application
87	NTAP	AVOID	0.18	185.38	+2%	EXPENSIVE (1.4x own history; FAIR vs peers)	components
88	MU	AVOID	0.18	958.16	+58%	EXPENSIVE	memory
89	FN	AVOID	0.18	395.00	+86%	EXPENSIVE (1.6x own history; FAIR vs peers)	networking
90	LITE	AVOID	0.18	847.37	+36%	EXPENSIVE	networking
91	PLXS	AVOID	0.18	242.07	+26%	EXPENSIVE	hardware
92	PANW	AVOID	0.16	331.94	+16%	EXPENSIVE	hardware
93	MXL	AVOID	0.16	59.45	+59%	FAIR	semiconductors
94	AMKR	AVOID	0.16	46.94	+63%	EXPENSIVE (1.7x own history; FAIR vs peers)	semiconductors
95	CRM	AVOID	0.16 ⚠	264.43	+2%	CHEAP	application
96	BE	AVOID	0.16	235.55	+17%	EXPENSIVE	power
97	GNRC	AVOID	0.16	183.02	+55%	EXPENSIVE (1.7x own history; FAIR vs peers)	power
98	ICHR	AVOID	0.16 ⚠	52.82	+81%	CHEAP	semiconductors
99	ACMR	AVOID	0.16	69.42	+70%	EXPENSIVE (1.4x own history; FAIR vs peers)	equipment
100	LOGI	AVOID	0.16	101.71	+5%	FAIR	hardware
101	AXTI	AVOID	0.14	56.20	+63%	EXPENSIVE	semiconductors
102	MKSI	AVOID	0.14	249.65	+67%	EXPENSIVE (2.3x own history; FAIR vs peers)	equipment
103	AAPL	AVOID	0.14	328.21	-1%	EXPENSIVE	hardware
104	AMBA	AVOID	0.13 ⚠	63.38	+50%	EXPENSIVE	semiconductors
105	VIAV	AVOID	0.13	33.63	+83%	CHEAP	semiconductors
106	AAOI	AVOID	0.13 ⚠	100.38	+63%	FAIR	semiconductors
107	CBRS	AVOID	0.13	190.44	+53%	EXPENSIVE	semiconductors
108	QCOM	AVOID	0.12	168.57	+15%	CHEAP	compute
109	AAON	AVOID	0.12	77.98	+83%	FAIR	thermal
110	ENTG	AVOID	0.12	130.70	+33%	EXPENSIVE (2.2x own history; FAIR vs peers)	equipment
111	VECO	AVOID	0.12	42.55	+44%	EXPENSIVE (4.8x own history; FAIR vs peers)	equipment
112	SYNA	AVOID	0.12	97.68	+33%	CHEAP	semiconductors
113	XNDU	AVOID	0.12	10.02	+229%	UNMEASURED	hardware
114	NBIS	AVOID	0.11 ⚠	210.63	+36%	UNMEASURED	cloud
115	BHE	AVOID	0.11	71.21	+21%	EXPENSIVE	hardware
116	DELL	AVOID	0.10	516.39	+8%	EXPENSIVE	servers
117	HPQ	AVOID	0.10	31.93	-8%	EXPENSIVE (1.6x own history; FAIR vs peers)	hardware
118	CEG	AVOID	0.10 ⚠	285.05	+22%	FAIR	power
119	LASR	AVOID	0.09	41.47	+114%	EXPENSIVE	semiconductors
120	SMCI	AVOID	0.09 ⚠	37.87	+12%	CHEAP	servers
121	LFUS	AVOID	0.09	414.24	+18%	EXPENSIVE	components
122	POWL	AVOID	0.08	175.16	+60%	EXPENSIVE (8.6x own history; FAIR vs peers)	power
123	HPE	AVOID	0.08	54.44	+24%	EXPENSIVE	servers
124	P	AVOID	0.08	98.15	+33%	EXPENSIVE	components
125	SANM	AVOID	0.07	195.69	+33%	EXPENSIVE (2.4x own history; FAIR vs peers)	hardware
126	NRG	AVOID	0.07	111.84	+69%	EXPENSIVE (2.9x own history; FAIR vs peers)	power
127	AZTA	AVOID	0.07	31.18	+13%	EXPENSIVE	equipment
128	VSH	AVOID	0.07	30.45	+28%	EXPENSIVE (12.0x own history; FAIR vs peers)	hardware
129	TTMI	AVOID	0.07	115.39	+86%	EXPENSIVE (2.1x own history; FAIR vs peers)	hardware
130	UCTT	AVOID	0.07	66.59	+106%	CHEAP	semiconductors
131	VST	AVOID	0.06	144.22	+51%	CHEAP	power
132	WDC	AVOID	0.06	441.57	+51%	EXPENSIVE	memory
133	JCI	AVOID	0.06	142.23	+15%	EXPENSIVE (1.9x own history; FAIR vs peers)	thermal
134	QRVO	AVOID	0.06	100.38	-10%	CHEAP	semiconductors
135	INTC	AVOID	0.06	91.67	+25%	EXPENSIVE	compute
136	ENPH	AVOID	0.06	36.31	+30%	CHEAP	semiconductors
137	SLAB	AVOID	0.05	220.71	+1%	EXPENSIVE	semiconductors
138	MOD	AVOID	0.05	186.63	+66%	EXPENSIVE (2.6x own history; FAIR vs peers)	thermal
139	SEDG	AVOID	0.05	33.80	+14%	EXPENSIVE	semiconductors
140	COHR	AVOID	0.04	264.41	+57%	EXPENSIVE (2.6x own history; FAIR vs peers)	networking
141	ATKR	AVOID	0.04	93.65	-0%	CHEAP	power
142	COHU	AVOID	0.04	45.98	+54%	FAIR	equipment
143	SWKS	AVOID	0.04	71.50	-4%	EXPENSIVE (2.2x own history; FAIR vs peers)	semiconductors
144	MRCY	AVOID	0.03	84.71	+37%	EXPENSIVE	hardware
145	APD	AVOID	0.03	304.22	+13%	UNVERIFIED	materials
146	CRWV	AVOID	0.03	84.56	+71%	UNMEASURED	cloud
147	SNOW	AVOID	0.02	356.47	-7%	EXPENSIVE	application
148	AVT	AVOID	0.02	90.82	+17%	EXPENSIVE (2.7x own history; FAIR vs peers)	components
149	TLN	AVOID	0.01 ⚠	305.52	+51%	CHEAP	power
150	NVTS	AVOID	0.00	11.10	+27%	UNMEASURED	semiconductors

Score (0-1) is a single OPPORTUNITY measure - quality relative to price - with BOTH thesis-fit AND actionability folded in: valuation, quality, growth, upside, reduced for disqualifiers (not a toll-collector, overbuild, value trap, falling estimates, governance/regulatory) and for actionability (expensive, premium to own history, chasing, no buy confirmation). The verdict is DERIVED from the score, so sorting by score always tracks the tiers - no BUY sits below a WAIT. A great company at the wrong price scores like an opportunity that isn't there. ⚠ marks a provisional score (own-history unverified). ⏳ a stale score; the red glyph a governance risk.

RANK FRAGILE: 3 name(s) rank outside their own 5-95% interval (FSLR, IPGP, QCOM) - the published rank is not robust to input noise in a dense band. NOT a path disagreement: verify with rank_intervals(magnitude=0), which must collapse every interval onto its point estimate

Falsification monitors · ESCALATED posture

falsification gate closed (ESCALATED posture): no demand monitor has confirmed RED; sentiment wobbles are not falsification; UNTESTED (never fired in the replay, GREEN not yet validated against an event): backlog, supply-response, capex-financing - and capex-financing GATES the escalator

Are the picks working?

Not financial advice - you decide and place the trade. Re-verify live price + FX at execution.

tier	names	vs VOO	beat VOO
STRONG BUY	17 ANECDOTE - not a statistic	+6.08%	-
BUY	87	-4.25%	-
WAIT	678	-2.66%	-
AVOID	886	-4.21%	-